Bitcoin ETFs pull assets as gold bleeds since Iran conflict—JPMorgan flags a new hedging regime
Since Feb. 27, GLD shed ~2.7% of AUM while IBIT gained ~1.5%. Options, short interest, and breadth show institutions reshaping bitcoin’s risk profile against gold.

Because Bitcoin
March 13, 2026
Investors responded to last month’s Iran conflict by rotating in opposite directions across the two dominant “safe-haven” proxies. The largest gold fund, SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), saw outflows of roughly 2.7% of assets since Feb. 27, while BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) drew inflows of about 1.5% of assets over the same window. That swing flipped the year-to-date edge gold ETFs held over bitcoin ETFs earlier in 2026, though it did not erase gold’s stronger fourth-quarter 2025 outperformance.
Here’s the piece that matters: positioning data now looks less like a binary “risk-on/risk-off” vote and more like the buildout of a full risk toolkit around bitcoin. Rising use of shorts and puts on IBIT suggests institutions are not abandoning BTC; they’re institutionalizing it.
Flows and AUM context - From October through year-end, money rotated out of bitcoin and into gold—particularly among retail. IBIT posted notable outflows while GLD absorbed strong inflows. - Over a longer arc, bitcoin ETFs still lead. Since 2024, IBIT’s cumulative inflows are roughly double GLD’s. - IBIT’s assets under management nearly matched GLD’s in July last year before the gap widened again as bitcoin fell following the market correction that began in October.
Institutional positioning is evolving - Short interest in IBIT increased in recent months while short interest in GLD declined, narrowing the spread. That pattern points to hedge funds trimming bitcoin exposure and favoring gold tactically. - Even so, IBIT’s short interest generally remains lower than GLD’s, which fits gold’s longer history and deeper institutional penetration. - Options speak louder: IBIT’s put-to-call open interest ratio rose above GLD’s last November and has stayed higher. It’s the first sustained period where bitcoin ETF options show greater demand for downside protection than gold ETF options. - Translating that: more puts relative to calls indicates institutions are actively hedging bitcoin downside. The growing use of IBIT options signals investors are moving past simple directional bets toward comprehensive risk management.
Volatility, liquidity, and breadth tell a nuanced story - Despite positioning that looks more constructive for gold (lower puts, lower shorts), other indicators cut against it. GLD’s options-implied volatility has climbed more sharply than IBIT’s, implying expectations for larger swings in gold. - Market breadth has deteriorated more for GLD than for IBIT. A rising Hui-Heubel ratio—often used as a liquidity/breadth gauge—points to weaker participation in the gold ETF market. - Bitcoin’s volatility profile shows signs of compression, consistent with deeper institutional ownership and improving spot and derivatives liquidity.
My read What changes behavior is not narrative; it’s plumbing. As IBIT’s derivatives and securities lending markets deepen, bitcoin becomes a programmable risk unit inside traditional portfolios. When funds can pair long exposure with liquid hedges—puts, shorts, basis—they can carry BTC through drawdowns rather than exiting at the first sign of stress. Near term, that shows up as higher put/call ratios and rising short interest, which can look “bearish.” In practice, it’s the scaffolding for durable allocation: tighter spreads, more two-way flow, less gap risk.
Gold’s weaker breadth and faster-rising implied volatility suggest investors may be crowding into fewer trades, which can magnify moves during shocks. Bitcoin’s gradual volatility compression points the other way—more participants, better inventory management, and healthier transfer of risk across time horizons.
Strategically, the flow divergence since Feb. 27 is less a referendum on “digital gold” and more a signal that bitcoin’s market structure is catching up. That structural shift aligns with the reiterated long-term bitcoin price target of $266,000 derived from a volatility-adjusted comparison to gold. If volatility continues to normalize and hedging capacity expands, the path to higher equilibrium allocations widens—even if headlines push investors back and forth in the short run.
Bitcoin traded near $70,500 at the time of writing, roughly unchanged over the past 24 hours.
