Bitcoin Miner Stocks Drop as IREN and CleanSpark Miss Revenue and Lean Harder Into AI

IREN and CleanSpark missed quarterly revenue, triggering double‑digit stock declines as Bitcoin slid 11%. The market is testing miners’ AI pivots amid volatile GAAP results.

Bitcoin
Cryptocurrency
Regulations
Economy
Because Bitcoin
Because Bitcoin

Because Bitcoin

February 6, 2026

Bitcoin miners got hit from both sides: weaker-than-expected quarterly revenue and a sharp Bitcoin selloff. Shares of CleanSpark and IREN slid Thursday as investors reassessed execution risk, capital structure, and the credibility of their AI narratives in a risk-off tape.

- CleanSpark fell $1.95, roughly 19% on the day, and traded at $7.55 after hours. - IREN dropped $5.11, about 11%, ending the session at $32.42 after the close.

The core issue wasn’t just the miss—it was the signaling. Markets often punish miners harder in down drafts because earnings quality is tightly tethered to BTC and power economics, and GAAP can swing violently with asset marks and financing costs.

What the numbers say - IREN reported fiscal Q2 (ended Dec 31, 2025) revenue of $184.7 million, down from $240.3 million in the prior quarter, and a net loss of $155.4 million versus $384.6 million in net income previously. - Results carried sizable non-cash and one-time items: $219.2 million of unrealized losses on financial instruments, a debt conversion inducement expense, and $31.8 million of mining hardware impairments linked to an ASIC-to-GPU transition at its British Columbia sites as it retools for AI cloud. - CleanSpark posted $181.2 million in revenue for the same quarter, higher year-over-year, but booked a $378.7 million net loss versus net income in the prior-year period. The company cited non-cash charges tied to Bitcoin price movements and asset revaluations. - CleanSpark ended the quarter with $458 million in cash, $1 billion in Bitcoin, $1.3 billion in working capital, and $1.8 billion in long-term debt.

The prints arrived as Bitcoin fell more than 11% on the day—amplifying perceptions of earnings volatility and balance-sheet exposure across listed miners.

The real question: does the AI pivot actually de-risk these businesses? Many miners are chasing a similar playbook: let BTC mining fund near-term cash needs while repurposing scale—power, cooling, and real estate—into higher-yield AI infrastructure. On paper, it’s elegant. In practice, it’s a sequencing challenge.

- Technology transition: IREN’s ASIC-to-GPU pivot in British Columbia highlights the friction. ASICs monetize hash with tight opex discipline; GPUs demand different thermal, networking, and orchestration stacks, plus new vendor and customer dependencies. Impairments today reflect sunk adjustments before revenue ramps tomorrow. - Revenue quality: AI cloud only diversifies if utilization is high and contracts are sticky. Otherwise, miners swap BTC price risk for demand risk and pricing cycles in AI compute. The market is waiting for proof of booked capacity, realized utilization, and gross margins net of power and depreciation. - Capital structure and optics: Non-cash marks—whether on digital assets, financial instruments, or revaluations—make GAAP noisy. Still, they influence sentiment because they speak to treasury policy and risk appetite. CleanSpark’s mix of $458 million in cash, $1 billion in Bitcoin, and $1.8 billion of long-term debt gives it optionality, but it also concentrates exposure to BTC drawdowns. For IREN, a debt conversion inducement and unrealized losses suggest a period of balance-sheet reshaping alongside the AI buildout. - Execution burden: Shifting from self-mining to AI services requires a go-to-market engine—capacity allocation, customer onboarding, SLAs, and cash collection cycles. The quote-level messaging from management emphasizes progress on capacity, customer engagement, and capital formation; the equity market wants quantifiable KPIs and timelines.

What investors will watch next - GPU capacity online vs. contracted, realized utilization, average selling prices, and unit economics. - Power contract flexibility and curtailment monetization across BTC and AI workloads. - Treasury transparency: hedging, BTC liquidation cadence, and triggers for balance-sheet de-risking. - Capex pacing relative to cash flow, especially with debt service and potential equity dilution in view.

Bitcoin mining can still provide near-term cash flow; AI infrastructure can, over time, monetize fixed assets at premium yields. That combination can work, but it requires disciplined sequencing and clear disclosures. In a week where BTC dropped double digits, the market signaled it wants hard evidence—less narrative, more contracted revenue and cleaner earnings—even if the underlying non-cash noise eventually reverses.