Bitcoin Nears ETF Cost Basis as Inflows Turn Negative; Can the Structural Bid Hold?
Bitcoin is 28% below its October peak and edging toward ETFs’ ~$83K cost basis. With weekly flows negative and a Fed cut looming, traders test the strength of the structural bid.

Because Bitcoin
December 9, 2025
Bitcoin’s slide from the October high is pressing toward a line in the sand: the U.S. spot ETF cohort’s aggregate cost basis. Price has retraced 28% from $126,000 to $89,900 today (down ~1.5%), after bouncing from a December 2 low near $84,600. Weekly net inflows have flipped negative since the start of December, raising a simple question with complex implications: does the ETF break-even zone around $83,000 still function as support?
Why the ETF cost basis matters - Since early 2024, two >30% drawdowns (March–August 2024 and January–April 2025) found bottoms and reversed near the ETFs’ average entry. In both windows, weekly ETF net flows were negative. That pattern suggests the cost basis has acted as a reflexive anchor: as price approaches it, ETF investors tend to defend, and swing traders often front-run that defense. - Today, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs hold $117.67 billion of BTC, about 6.55% of circulating supply. That inventory is not just a statistic; it’s a structural bid that narrows float and concentrates decision-making in a large, rules-based cohort. - With weekly flows currently in the red, the market is again testing whether that inventory and its owners’ tolerance can absorb stress. If the cost-basis zone holds, it can catalyze a reflex bounce and re-engage momentum accounts. If it breaks on expanding volume, the same anchor can flip to an overhang as underwater holders reassess.
The flow dynamic beneath the headline ETF creations and redemptions move via authorized participants who arbitrage primary and secondary market demand. When flows slow, the “passive bid” fades and spot liquidity does more of the work. That’s where the cost basis becomes psychological as much as mechanical: many investors reference it as a fair-value proxy, and market makers often shade liquidity around it. This interplay is why negative weekly flows did not preclude prior bottoms near the ETF break-even—price discovered the level where marginal sellers ran out of urgency.
Macro sets the tone for durability The next catalyst is the Fed. Futures markets are pricing a quarter-point cut on Wednesday, with no additional move implied until June. A clear signal that another cut could arrive sooner—contingent on a softer labor market and inflation expectations anchored in the 2–3% range—would likely loosen financial conditions and support a floor-building process at or above ~$83,000. Conversely, a cautious or hawkish tilt would sap risk appetite and make any bounce off the ETF cost basis more fragile. There’s also the uneasy possibility of a policy error if easing proceeds while services inflation remains sticky above the 2% goal.
How I’m framing the setup - Respect the anchor until it’s invalidated. The ~$83,000 cluster has retained significance across multiple regimes. I’d watch for renewed daily net creations, even modestly positive, as confirmation that the cohort is re-accumulating. - Monitor microstructure. Repeated wick rejections and responsive buying between $84,600 and $83,000 during U.S. hours would indicate the structural bid is active. A clean break-and-hold below the zone on heavier outflows would mark a character change. - Let the Fed guide the “how long” question. A growth-supportive cut could extend the pattern of bottoms near ETF cost basis. A hawkish glide path would raise the probability the anchor slips.
In short, Bitcoin is drifting toward a well-watched ETF break-even band with flows cooling. That area has repeatedly attracted demand since last year, but the durability of any response now hinges on whether ETF inflows reappear and whether the Fed’s tone invites risk back into the book.
