Pompliano’s ProCap Ramps Up BRR Buybacks as Shares Trade at Deep Discount to Bitcoin NAV
Pompliano’s ProCap buys back BRR while trading ~35% below a $305M NAV. It holds 5,007 BTC (~$325M). BRR is down 85% from its peak; CEO added $1M and takes a $1 salary.

Because Bitcoin
February 24, 2026
Anthony Pompliano is leaning into a classic closed‑end fund playbook: when your stock trades below the value of your balance sheet, retire shares. ProCap Financial, his publicly listed Bitcoin treasury vehicle, repurchased 148,241 BRR shares—about $359,000 worth at Monday’s close—as it works to pull its mNAV back toward 1. By the firm’s math, net assets (cash plus Bitcoin less convertible debt) sit near $305 million, while the equity value in the market is under $202 million. In his framing, ProCap just bought roughly $1 of value for about $0.65 and intends to keep buying while that gap persists.
Under the hood, ProCap holds 5,007 BTC, valued around $325 million at recent prices. The company began repurchases in December and, by earlier this month, had taken back roughly 2% of BRR’s outstanding shares. Pompliano has also put in personal capital—$1 million committed in December—and draws a $1 salary. He receives no equity compensation unless BRR trades at $15 per share, a level that implies roughly a 520% jump from Monday’s $2.42 close. The stock is down about 76% over the past six months and 85% from last year’s peak.
The backdrop matters. Bitcoin slipped nearly 4% over the last 24 hours to about $64,888 and is down almost 49% from October’s high above $126,000. As BTC and ETH retraced, the premiums once associated with digital asset treasuries (DATs) compressed. Firms like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) often commanded a market premium to their underlying crypto; today, nearly every notable DAT is running with an mNAV below 1. That environment rewards buybacks over fresh coin accumulation when a vehicle’s own equity trades at a steeper discount than the asset it holds.
The central question is whether buybacks can sustainably close ProCap’s discount. Repurchasing shares below NAV is mechanically accretive—each dollar spent increases NAV per share—yet small programs rarely change investor psychology on their own. Discounts in structures like BRR tend to reflect more than mark‑to‑market volatility. Investors may be pricing governance risk, overhead drag, the convertible debt overhang, and uncertainty around capital allocation if crypto keeps sliding. Without a redemption mechanism, these vehicles can trade like closed‑end funds, where persistent discounts require consistent programmatic buybacks, occasional tenders, or fee and policy shifts to fully re‑rate.
ProCap’s signaling is deliberate. Management is buying stock, not more BTC, which hints at discipline: if BRR trades at 0.65x of NAV, repurchases beat stacking sats on a per‑share value basis. Pompliano’s $1 salary and high‑hurdle equity trigger suggest alignment, even if some investors might prefer compensation tied directly to closing the discount rather than just price. The firm’s on‑chain verifiability of holdings and transparent NAV methodology (cash plus Bitcoin less convertibles) can help, but the market may still want clarity on the path for the convertible debt and the cadence and size of future buybacks.
What to watch next: - Pace and scale of repurchases relative to daily liquidity. A steady, rules‑based program can gradually compress the discount. - Any move toward tenders, fee reductions, or explicit return‑of‑capital policies—tools that often unlock value faster than open‑market buys alone. - Bitcoin’s path. A stabilizing BTC frequently narrows DAT discounts; fresh volatility can widen them despite buybacks. - Policy on additional leverage or new capital raises. Discounted equity issuance would be penalized; retiring converts on favorable terms could be rewarded.
ProCap did not immediately provide further comment. For now, the trade is straightforward: if BRR keeps exchanging hands well below the value of its Bitcoin and cash, buying back stock remains the rational allocation. The market will decide whether that discipline, applied consistently, is enough to close a ~35% gap.
